Philosophical Speculations

Hello deer friend: An example of a technical device is a mass spectrometer. It produces effects called signals. These signals (PHYSIS) are caused by particles (PHYSIS) These signals are NOT caused by the masses of the particles. The measurements of masses are internally calculated from/about the sig...

I just presuppose all that we can detect.
This is how scientists like I work.

>>>For that idea to be coherently asserted, it must exist and correspond to something in observational experience.<<< Nope. Harry Potter is, as mentioned earlier, a counterexample. Harry Potter per se = as such... does NOT exist. Redness and any other color does not exist, either. Each is NO-thing b...

"thinking" is "continual re-arrangements in a brain"
Iow all that you DO use here, it is your brain.

>>>to have access to<<<
it symbolizes that we can see, hear, touch, smell, taste it.
And/or that a technical device will produce a response from/about it.

We have access to the apple
but we do not have acces to the color of an apple.

>>>if the PSYCHE is all you know<<<

Nope, deer friend.

All that you and I DO know =
can fabricate awareness = experience = knownness = knowledge = imaginary = PSYCHE = no-thing)
from/about,
it is
- PHYSIS = things, the universe as such
- LOGOI = assertions {OF=FAKING} PSYCHE

"To exist" merely symbolizes "causes its awareness=is-ness=existence=no-thing) by - an observation process (see, hear, touch, smell, taste) - a detection process in a technical device. If you doubt that an apple exists, then you are merely trying to re-define. For this reasion i chall...

- Is-ness = existence, - ought-, should-, must-ness = importance, relevance, necessity - Logic (identity, distinction) each is imaginary = PSYCHE = NO-thing = does not exist. An assertion (LOGOI) {OF=objectizing=FAKING} NO-thing, it will be deemed to be TRUE, warrant-full by somebody FALSE, warrant-...

I'm not sure how this makes the neuroscientific evidence against physicalism less problematic. (Terminal lucidity, psychedelic experiences, hypoxic experiences, etc.) But this is already addressed in Greyson's response. First, the 'spike' in brain activity is much weaker than waking state activity ...

"through sensory perceptions" It is not I who asserts this, quite the contrary: Perception, detection, experience, awareness, regardles HOW you creatively put it, each is NO-thing = does not exist = not change = not cause "I think" = "My brain is fabricating an awareness=a t...