Philosophical Speculations

No.

Cosmological Multiverse is the simplest model to account for the incredible number of distinct universes necessary to make this one unsurprising. Cosmologists have probably thought of all possible patterns that can produce infinite worlds. The problem with Multiverse is the number of useless univer...

Goff's lucky conclusion is absurd, but publish hot takes or perish, even if the conclusion is worthless.

Cosmological Multiverse is the simplest model to account for the incredible number of distinct universes necessary to make this one unsurprising. Cosmologists have probably thought of all possible patterns that can produce infinite worlds. The problem with Multiverse is the number of useless univers...

Atheism entails the cosmological Multiverse because of cosmic fine-tuning, or accepting that we're just astronomically squared lucky like Goff.

Multiverse might undo atheism because it's a quantifiable reductio ad absurdum. Philosophy of Mind might be consensually irresolvable and most won't have the time or skill to arrive at the optimally aesthetic identity cosmopsychism as a default position.

This post intentionally left blank.

A cosmic disassociated mind will have disproportionately many Boltzmann brains, violating the anthropic principle.

How does a nonmetacognitive cosmic scale mind evolve flawless disassociation before metacognition? But why do we assume that it has ever been a singular one before dissociation? May be it is dissociated and has always been dissociated by its very nature? How does a fundamentally disassociated cosmi...

How does a nonmetacognitive cosmic scale mind evolve flawless disassociation before metacognition?