Philosophical Speculations

What does fallability mean in this context?

Dr. Shu, JW is trolling in the comment-section of the video as well. He says they are "two mediocre people".
I think he is watching BK all day or something. I am wondering where he is coming from when he thingks
he is the only one with substance.

One of the reasons I like BK is his admitted fallibility. He's entitled to choose who he engages with - aren't we all? But he holds nothing back in discussions - all is revealed. I remember when Jordan P was talking to John Vervaeke, who was enthusing about his discussion with BK, Jordan P asked ho...

I somewhat agree with you....BK is not perfect ;=

Can you give (post) an example where SH is defending idealism?
Yes, calling SH article a "disgusting piece" is over the top.
Alexander, be he right or wrong, is probably is a character to
be distrusted.

findingblanks wrote: ↑Wed Dec 15, 2021 5:44 pm Mark, sorry if this is a nerdy question which misses the point, but what specifically do you mean by 'ignoring' when you say that Sam Harris is ignoring Bernardo? Thanks!

kinda this:
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=395
(scroll until you find the entry by BK)

:D Of course, BK has not responded. :D the pain of not being heard. Viel Feind, viel Ehr. (many enemies, much honor). And the dilemma is that with BK not responding it serves to reinforce JW's conviction and assertion that BK is evading him, which in turn spurs JW on in goading-mode, and spurs me o...

Soul_of_Shu wrote: ↑Wed Dec 15, 2021 2:05 pm
Of course, BK has not responded.

the pain of not being heard.
Viel Feind, viel Ehr.
(many enemies, much honor).

Found this by complete fluke, seems to be on 4 days from now.

got it. when will you open your dana shares everything thread?