Philosophical Speculations

Thanks, Ashvin. I have enough material to think about on what you have said here and in your essays, And yes, it is sure that I’m going to raise more questions.

Ashvin, thank you for your thought. What you say sounds good, all our movements would be a permanent connection and, in that sense, a prayer. I made the question because usually what is understood as a prayer is a set of words, I thought that may be there is in SS a specific prayers or method to say...

Cleric, almost at the end of your essay “Beyond the Flat M@l” you say: “We need the missing science of prayer which leads us to the knowledge of the above through Imagination, Inspiration and Intuition. What is today commonly called prayer is a caricature. Without this prayer-like openness for the w...

Hi TriloByte ... Thanks for your comment. Just a reminder to all, as per the new guidelines posted here , in this sub-forum, initial posts should first address the original post and poster, before addressing other posters who are already engaged in discussing the OP, in order to avoid getting into ...

I should mention that I've discovered a logical error in the essay. To correct it, I've done a strike-through on the sentence: Note that there can only be one formlessness, since if there were two, there must be that which distinguishes one from the other, which means they would have form. [See Add...

My understanding was that the "formlessness" is not a "mystical" state of the absence of forms, but formless/existential aspects of every form. So, formlessness is present regardless whether any forms are present or not. Every form has these following formless aspects: beingness...

TriloByte said in the Cleric/Eugene thread I would agree. I think that was what Scott Roberts was doing, integrating BK idealism, non-dualism and Steinerian Science in one philosophy. I don’t know if he is still working in that regard. Sadly he doesn’t write in this forum as much as he did before. ...

So again, IMO for the wholistic approach a fusion of both is needed. I would agree. I think that was what Scott Roberts was doing, integrating BK idealism, non-dualism and Steinerian Science in one philosophy. I don’t know if he is still working in that regard. Sadly he doesn’t write in this forum ...

I suspect that there are people in the forum who now think that it's useless to read PoF because it's 'outdated', it is incorrect, misleading, etc. Not at all. Right now I am reading PoF motivated by your posts and effort. Thank you Cleric and AshvinP, please don’t stop writing. And thank you Eugen...