Philosophical Speculations

Just think what the very same authors that come up with these articles, would concoct, if they had to write something about your own stuff.

Nice try :) , but I'm still not convinced. Yes, our field of awareness has a mysterious quality of wholeness, all our experiences, thoughts and perceptions are always inseparably integrated into the oneness of consciousness. Yet, this does not mean that such wholeness represents a noun ("entit...

If it is never seen how it is possible to prove that it exists? I think we already agreed in another thread that what we know from our direct conscious experience is the definite presence of the "causative spiritual activity" in our conscious experience, which we linguistically can label ...

OK. However, thinking does not precede everything we can be. That's what the previous post was about. We awaken into our life as ready-made beings. We don't create consciously our physical, etheric, astral bodies. All this was created for us. Our "I" simply gets into the driver seat. That...

That's why thinking (as far as we are cognitive beings) is primary. Because even the word "I" is already a product of thinking. As soon as we produce "I", we create the split in the World. We oppose this "I" to everything else, that now becomes not-I. These splits come ...

The "I" is the thing that sees but is never seen. Common analogy is "just as the eye sees but can never see itself" (assuming no mirrors). The thoughts that we ourselves produce (for example the words of the voice in our head), when consciously observed, are the only thing within...

OK, no problem.

It all boils down to our ability to observe thinking - the voice in our head. If you can pronounce slowly "I think" in your mind and be able to observe what you are doing, you are basically observing your own thinking.

I don't understand, can you elaborate plz ? OK. Before this and the things below, can make sense, one must make the effort to observe one's own thinking . The thing is that normally, when we think about something, we experience the meaning of what we think but we are not conscious of the thinking p...

OK, my bad, probably the word 'absolute' is inappropriate. To be honest, I have no idea how exactly it is used in strictly philosophical context :) I had something fairly simple in mind. Think of the words "thinking exists". Not just as something external but the actual experience of prono...

Thank you, Lou