This critical question is about Bernardo’s choice to introduce the idea of dissociation as a way to explain the de-combination of universal consciousness into each of our personal psyches. First, I would notice how Bernardo proceeds to reject a common objection to idealism, namely the natural order...
[/quote] In private conversations BK is usually open to the idea of the "persistence of a sense of ipseity after death". He is aware of a large body of NDE accounts supporting this idea, however, he does not take them as scientifically valid evidences, so, in his academic-level works he av...
Thank you Cleric K,
This is very helpful, and not the least aggravating.
I also think the current times must be evolution’s kindergarten, suffice it to take a look at the state of the world and alas at some personal thinking patterns as well. Now taking time to get closer to these ideas.
If there is one critical question you could ask Bernardo, or one critique you could offer him, what would it be? I’m hosting AMAs on my Discord server and there is a good chance another round of questions with Bernardo is coming up in which we like to focus on criticism of analytic idealism (or Ber...
At best, this is a re-imagining of some point about corporeal death/dissolution being indicative of the end of the subject><object dynamic of the dissociative separate-self state. At which point, in BK's model, there is no discrete 'person' left to be a subject in relation to an object . To some ex...
I have zero knowledge of Rudolf Steiner. Until coming to this forum, Steiner was for me some sort of eclectic thinker somehow connected to alternative medicine and alternative education. That’s how far it goes in my books… So I want to read The Philosophy of Freedom and I can’t do it in German. Goog...
Hi findingblanks,
The initial BK statement is not crystal clear to me/I can't recall it from the books/videos I'm aware of. Could you please link it or give a more detailed report?
Thank you, Soul_of_Shu, for rearranging everything!
I seize the opportunity to also express gratitude for the generous, inspiring replies to my certainly previously adressed questions and more generally for the chance of participating in this forum.
Thank you
Well, the only anthroposophist I met so far is Cleric and Ashvin, and I can see that they are quite dogmatic and I haven't seen them so far admitting that they or Steiner are or have ever been wrong in anything. As I've stated elsewhere, I have no affiliations with the anthroposophical society. Bef...