Philosophical Speculations

I counter-assert that we are not, not in the slightest, "conscious about our thoughts" Neither is a thought the- or one cause of consciousness Nor is the consciousness the- or one cause at a thought. A thought and (a) consciousness are, instead categorically the same: Imaginary. Thought = ...

If the symbol "experience" is symbolizing- / synonymous with- / meaning: Detected-, realized-, aware-, per-/conceived-, observed-, experienced-, -ness/-hood = informed-ness/-hood = information = property = truth = opinion iow all that is - "invisible TO the eye" = totally undetec...

"to prove materialism" Honestly, what is this text string even symbolizing? What is it intended to be symbolizing? My understanding of the assertion is "to prove that the assertion OF Materialism IS true" Why is that? Simple as this: Any worldview, be it Materialism, Realism, Ide...

When Bernhard Kastrup asserts "Time is [BUT] in us" I concour. He's assertion is - to me - just an example of the famous assertions "Truth (property) is invisible TO the eye" - all that we DO watch, if not even hear, it is visible or audible symbols on the paper, the watch, the t...

"Does time flow?" IF we are asserting that some-thing flows, in other words acts, goes forth, passes by, do we not presuppose that it exists in the first place? How can some-thing even flow, in other words change, if it does not even exist, iow cannot change? As a Nominalist, i assert that...