Formlessness><form as the uncaused, irreducible ontic fundamental

Here both posters and comments will be restricted to topic-specific discourse. Comments should directly address the original post and poster. Comments and/or links that are deemed to be too digressive or off-topic, may be deleted by a moderator.
User avatar
Eugene I
Posts: 1484
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2021 9:49 pm

Re: Formlessness><form as the uncaused, irreducible ontic fundamental

Post by Eugene I »

Starbuck wrote: Sun Apr 04, 2021 7:55 am Beautifully expressed. But a bit wordy. Now what we need is some kind of symbol - perhaps an interlocking vertical and horizontal axis to represent the integration of those world views. The vertical is the ontic primary, so we could make that slightly longer. If the axis was metaphorically some kind of torture or execution device, it might also 'point' towards suffering that the integrated view both embraces and transcends.
And that's exactly the Christian cross where the separate ego-self dies and the core consciousness is resurrected and integrated into the formless vertical with its "hands" embracing the horizontal world of forms.
"Toto, I have a feeling we're not in Kanzas anymore" Dorothy
Starbuck
Posts: 176
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2021 1:22 pm

Re: Formlessness><form as the uncaused, irreducible ontic fundamental

Post by Starbuck »

Eugene I wrote: Sun Apr 04, 2021 12:45 pm
Starbuck wrote: Sun Apr 04, 2021 7:55 am Beautifully expressed. But a bit wordy. Now what we need is some kind of symbol - perhaps an interlocking vertical and horizontal axis to represent the integration of those world views. The vertical is the ontic primary, so we could make that slightly longer. If the axis was metaphorically some kind of torture or execution device, it might also 'point' towards suffering that the integrated view both embraces and transcends.
And that's exactly the Christian cross where the separate ego-self dies and the core consciousness is resurrected and integrated into the formless vertical with its "hands" embracing the horizontal world of forms.
Indeed, very few Christians I've ever met will thank you for pointing that out however :)
User avatar
AshvinP
Posts: 5464
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:00 am
Location: USA

Re: Formlessness><form as the uncaused, irreducible ontic fundamental

Post by AshvinP »

Eugene I wrote: Sun Apr 04, 2021 12:45 pm
Starbuck wrote: Sun Apr 04, 2021 7:55 am Beautifully expressed. But a bit wordy. Now what we need is some kind of symbol - perhaps an interlocking vertical and horizontal axis to represent the integration of those world views. The vertical is the ontic primary, so we could make that slightly longer. If the axis was metaphorically some kind of torture or execution device, it might also 'point' towards suffering that the integrated view both embraces and transcends.
And that's exactly the Christian cross where the separate ego-self dies and the core consciousness is resurrected and integrated into the formless vertical with its "hands" embracing the horizontal world of forms.
Amen! The ego-self dies so that it may be reborn in a transfigured form. We all experience that when we sacrifice an important aspect of our personality, perhaps an unhealthy addiction or relationship, to make room for another in our process of growth-maturation. There are few things more difficult to sacrifice than one's own self-image.
"Most people would sooner regard themselves as a piece of lava in the moon than as an 'I'"
User avatar
Soul_of_Shu
Posts: 2023
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2021 6:48 pm
Contact:

Re: Formlessness><form as the uncaused, irreducible ontic fundamental

Post by Soul_of_Shu »

AshvinP wrote: Mon Apr 05, 2021 12:57 amThere are few things more difficult to sacrifice than one's own self-image.

For sure ... In this case it took the indelible revelation that That which in essence is experiencing this personified self-image is not a person, but that fundamental, aware quiddity to which all such imagery can be traced as its imperative ideation. So absent the notion that one's ipseity is somehow other than, or apart from That, the sacrifice becomes, if not easy, at least understandable. And yet the sacrifice seems twofold: the one made for the sake of having this personal, relational experience, and the other made to then forsake it. As BK writes at the very end of DJM, 'Ours are indeed sacrificial lives ...'
Here out of instinct or grace we seek
soulmates in these galleries of hieroglyph and glass,
where mutual longings and sufferings of love
are laid bare in transfigured exhibition of our hearts,
we who crave deep secrets and mysteries,
as elusive as the avatars of our dreams.
Post Reply