The Nature of the sensory world or do we really *know* the ultimate ground of reality?

Any topics primarily focused on metaphysics can be discussed here, in a generally casual way, where conversations may take unexpected turns.
User avatar
Federica
Posts: 1716
Joined: Sat May 14, 2022 2:30 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: The Nature of the sensory world or do we really *know* the ultimate ground of reality?

Post by Federica »

Incidentally, Eugene, if you are reading, here is an insight about a possible meaning of having “reverence and longing for the unexpected”. One has reverence and longing when one is not satisfied with general statements such as:

Stranger wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 11:07 pm The whole World is a fairy tale imagined by Consciousness, and yet it is perceived as an objective reality when experienced from our individuated subjective perspectives

When one bitingly dismiss the insightfulness of the world of fairy tales, using that statement as a shut up, as if our world of forms was 'fairy' enough, and fairy tales on top of it were the least thing we should pay attention to, it should be possible to understand in which sense the position becomes referred to as: “lack of reverence and longing for the unexpected”, and as equivalent to: “saying “It’s all but a dream” but never actually attempting to find that orthogonal activity that can transform our be-ing into higher lucidity”, in the words of respectively Ashvin and Cleric.


With this, I guess you can at least renounce “considering such claims lies”?
This is the goal towards which the sixth age of humanity will strive: the popularization of occult truth on a wide scale. That's the mission of this age and the society that unites spiritually has the task of bringing this occult truth to life everywhere and applying it directly. That's exactly what our age is missing.
Stranger
Posts: 760
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2022 2:26 pm

Re: The Nature of the sensory world or do we really *know* the ultimate ground of reality?

Post by Stranger »

Federica wrote: Mon Mar 20, 2023 10:16 pm Incidentally, Eugene, if you are reading, here is an insight about a possible meaning of having “reverence and longing for the unexpected”. One has reverence and longing when one is not satisfied with general statements such as:

Stranger wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 11:07 pm The whole World is a fairy tale imagined by Consciousness, and yet it is perceived as an objective reality when experienced from our individuated subjective perspectives

When one bitingly dismiss the insightfulness of the world of fairy tales, using that statement as a shut up, as if our world of forms was 'fairy' enough, and fairy tales on top of it were the least thing we should pay attention to, it should be possible to understand in which sense the position becomes referred to as: “lack of reverence and longing for the unexpected”, and as equivalent to: “saying “It’s all but a dream” but never actually attempting to find that orthogonal activity that can transform our be-ing into higher lucidity”, in the words of respectively Ashvin and Cleric.

With this, I guess you can at least renounce “considering such claims lies”?
I think you misunderstood it in the opposite way. It was supposed to mean that the fairy tale of the world imagined by Consciousness is infinitely full of deep metaphorical and spiritual meanings for us to explore and learn from, just like other fairy tales discussed in that thread. Yet, it is still only a tale within the Consciousness imagination where we as individual selves exist only as the characters of the tale.
"You are not a drop in the ocean, you are the ocean in a drop" Rumi
User avatar
AshvinP
Posts: 5462
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:00 am
Location: USA

Re: The Nature of the sensory world or do we really *know* the ultimate ground of reality?

Post by AshvinP »

Federica wrote: Mon Mar 20, 2023 9:53 pm
So we realize that we are reading two transliterations of the same ‘orthogonal’ endeavor, and we can have them intertwine, and add to each other. Steiner says, the challenge of approaching the spiritual world is to abandon normal waking cognition while maintaining common sense. In Cleric’s words: "this lifting is not in order to fly away from our previous state but instead to complement it with new depths of consciousness." At the intersection of the two transliterations, the difficulty of finding the proper attitude, or gesture, that keeps us in contact with both worlds, becomes even more expressively pointed to. There’s the risk of remaining with the Giant of ordinary consciousness, failing to take that orthogonal lifting towards the higher worlds. And what’s even worse, is when we not only remain with the Giant, but also relinquish common sense. This is the case of mystical reductionism, where it's imagined that the lifting towards the higher worlds will happen within the boundaries of our existing ‘geometrical drawing kit’, and common sense has been relinquished, together with materialism and the interest for the detailed dynamics of the World Content, deemed unimportant and superfluous.
For this reason, mystical reductionism seems to materialize the exact opposite of the appropriate attitude required to maintain connection with both worlds the right way, and in certain sense it looks more dangerous than materialism, because materialism at least remains grounded in common sense, and interested in the variety of the World Content.

I'm glad you found it helpful, Federica. You make some very key points above.

The supreme (and unfortunate) irony is that mystical reductionism (MR) inevitably traps itself in materialism with regards to outer nature. By forsaking the 'common sense' of sound and strengthened reasoning, it traps itself even more thoroughly than the materialist who, as you say, still puts some level of trust in that capacity.

I have always found remarkable how many analytic idealists, including our resident MRs, fail to imagine that idealism or spiritualism taken seriously should also deepen our understanding of the natural sciences and the unfolding of human history. I now have a better appreciation of why this is so casually ignored, at least at the conscious level. Since no depth of soul-spirit process is perceived within outer reality, like the Sun, they feel all investigation of it is stuck on the 'horizontal plane' of applied technology which is practically irrelevant to spiritual reality. Nevertheless, one cannot exist in the modern world, with a modern soul constitution, and fail to think about and act on scientific knowledge. So the MRs simply double down on a materialistic understanding of the surrounding world and the unfolding of events.

Moreover, it is likely not even a current 21st century materialistic understanding, but one stuck in the 18th or 19th century. To be clear, we are all swinging between material and mystical reductionism to some extent when we are intellectually contemplating the world. But the longer we wait to begin loosening that intellectual mask and consciously experiencing the higher ideations, the more difficult it becomes to imagine anything other than the physical conceptions of Light, for ex. Although I hope otherwise, it is very doubtful to me that anyone fixated on collapsing living distinctions into mystical Oneness would have willingly endured attempts to understand anything just written by Cleric. And that is how the actual waking manifestation of Oneness in the world falls by the wayside as humans continue to dream much less than lucidly about oneness, materially or spiritually, and otherwise place blind faith in something external to save the world (or only them).
"Most people would sooner regard themselves as a piece of lava in the moon than as an 'I'"
User avatar
Federica
Posts: 1716
Joined: Sat May 14, 2022 2:30 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: The Nature of the sensory world or do we really *know* the ultimate ground of reality?

Post by Federica »

Stranger wrote: Tue Mar 21, 2023 12:36 am
Federica wrote: Mon Mar 20, 2023 10:16 pm Incidentally, Eugene, if you are reading, here is an insight about a possible meaning of having “reverence and longing for the unexpected”. One has reverence and longing when one is not satisfied with general statements such as:

Stranger wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 11:07 pm The whole World is a fairy tale imagined by Consciousness, and yet it is perceived as an objective reality when experienced from our individuated subjective perspectives

When one bitingly dismiss the insightfulness of the world of fairy tales, using that statement as a shut up, as if our world of forms was 'fairy' enough, and fairy tales on top of it were the least thing we should pay attention to, it should be possible to understand in which sense the position becomes referred to as: “lack of reverence and longing for the unexpected”, and as equivalent to: “saying “It’s all but a dream” but never actually attempting to find that orthogonal activity that can transform our be-ing into higher lucidity”, in the words of respectively Ashvin and Cleric.

With this, I guess you can at least renounce “considering such claims lies”?
the fairy tale of the world imagined by Consciousness is infinitely full of deep metaphorical and spiritual meanings for us to explore and learn from, just like other fairy tales discussed in that thread.


Glad to read that!
Please share your favorite fairy tale - what is one example of fairy tale that has helped you explore and learn?
This is the goal towards which the sixth age of humanity will strive: the popularization of occult truth on a wide scale. That's the mission of this age and the society that unites spiritually has the task of bringing this occult truth to life everywhere and applying it directly. That's exactly what our age is missing.
Stranger
Posts: 760
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2022 2:26 pm

Re: The Nature of the sensory world or do we really *know* the ultimate ground of reality?

Post by Stranger »

Federica wrote: Tue Mar 21, 2023 7:05 am Glad to read that!
Please share your favorite fairy tale - what is one example of fairy tale that has helped you explore and learn?
I often find inspiration in Biblical myths and stories that have deep esoteric meanings pointing to spiritual realities, for example, the Garden of Eden, the Passover and travel to the Promised Land, all those stories about Cain and Abel, Abraham, Isaak, Lot and his wife and daughters etc.
"You are not a drop in the ocean, you are the ocean in a drop" Rumi
User avatar
Federica
Posts: 1716
Joined: Sat May 14, 2022 2:30 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: The Nature of the sensory world or do we really *know* the ultimate ground of reality?

Post by Federica »

Stranger wrote: Tue Mar 21, 2023 12:18 pm
Federica wrote: Tue Mar 21, 2023 7:05 am Glad to read that!
Please share your favorite fairy tale - what is one example of fairy tale that has helped you explore and learn?
I often find inspiration in Biblical myths and stories that have deep esoteric meanings pointing to spiritual realities, for example, the Garden of Eden, the Passover and travel to the Promised Land, all those stories about Cain and Abel, Abraham, Isaak, Lot and his wife and daughters etc.

Should a layman or a stranger pass by, read this, and comment that this sounds dismissive, and doesn't seem to exude the least amount of reverence and longing for the unimagined and unexpected way reality can reveal itself in fairy tale form, it would be interesting to see who would have the stomach for calling him a liar! :D
This is the goal towards which the sixth age of humanity will strive: the popularization of occult truth on a wide scale. That's the mission of this age and the society that unites spiritually has the task of bringing this occult truth to life everywhere and applying it directly. That's exactly what our age is missing.
User avatar
Federica
Posts: 1716
Joined: Sat May 14, 2022 2:30 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: The Nature of the sensory world or do we really *know* the ultimate ground of reality?

Post by Federica »

Cleric K wrote: Sun Mar 19, 2023 7:03 pm Let’s continue with the theme of light. As hinted, we can’t go very far by trying to understand light (and this goes for the physical world as a whole) by imagining particles and fields, no matter how subtle, ‘made of’ consciousness and so on. This probably sounds insulting to the ears of the scientifically minded people of today. But it shouldn’t be if we understand the deeper reasons.

In close connection with the above quoted second episode of the meaning of the phenomenon of light, there are now Max Leyf's reflections on the same topic to consider. I personally have some difficulties getting them, at least at first read. Anthony, if you see this, would you please share what your understanding is of the given illustration of the meaning of light? Anyone else?

Max Leyf wrote:
relativistic spacetime and the essence of Light

“A man may fish with the worm that hath eat of a king, and eat of the fish that hath fed of that worm,” as Hamlet says


Overall, the theories of Special and General Relativity propose a view of the universe that is fundamentally different from classical physics and many of our ordinary intuitions about the physical world. Whereas classical physics departs from ordinary understandings of the meanings of space, as measured by a yardstick, and time by a chronograph, the theory of relativity proposes a view of the universe in which space and time are essentially related and, in a certain sense, identical as a sound is the same as a pitch. A sound can be “warped” and “flexed,” but not without warping and flexing the pitch. While space and time share in a fluid relation of identity, both together, according to the theory of relativity, are indexed in an absolute bond to the mystical “Universal Constant”— the enigmatic “C” in the notorious equation:

E=mc²

According to Special Relativity, space and time together are a function of the observer's motion, or inertial reference frame. This means that concepts such as simultaneity and the order of events can appear different to different observers. Was Kennedy assassinated before or after a distant star went supernova? Did the king eat the fish that ate the worm or did the fish eat the worm that ate the king? We say one thing with conviction but simultaneously affirm that another observer travelling at near relativistic speeds would be liable to come to an entirely different conclusion. Does this fact constitute the corroboration, by theoretical physicists vis-á-vis the so-called “real physical universe,” of what the relativists and nihilists and sorcerers and postmodernists have been insisting all along in the realm of culture and life? Let us leave the issue unresolved for the moment. As to the question of which sequence of events is correct, the question both does and does not admit of an answer. Relatively, the answer must remain contingent on the observer’s frame of reference. Hence, relativism may indeed appear to have carried off the palm.

But there is a transcendent and unequivocal answer that I will attempt to convey. The faster an observer travels, the more his mass increases and hence the more time appears to dilate for him relative to an inertial reference frame. This is illustrated by the famous “twins paradox,” in which one twin departs on a rocket ship and returns to find his other half long since having walked out of biological life. Having established that time is a function of an inertial reference frame, and that it stretches out with increase in mass and velocity, let us then extrapolate these relations towards ever-increasing mass and velocity. It will be seen that light, eo ipso, as the Universal Constant, is a limiting case and singularity in which all time, all space, and all mass are summarised and drawn together in simultaneity.1

Hence, “the Theory of Relativity” is somewhat ironically so-called. Instead, it postulates a single absolute reference frame, that is light, against which all other reference frames are relatively measured. Photons, therefore, do not “travel” because travel is a function of space per time, and neither space nor time exist at the “speed” of light, which has no speed in itself for the same reason, but only for us. Time does not pass for light for the same reason that it does not travel. Returning to the question about the sequence posed above: “who has ears, let him hear.” Let no one tell you, however, with the mantle of scientific authority, that “starlight from distant galaxies proves the Universe is 13.8 billion years old.”2 By his own logic, the statement makes no sense without a very specific qualification. As it was written, “the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God.”3

___


1
Did not the one who called himself “The Light of the World” (John 8:12, 9:5) also proclaim:

I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty. (Revelations 1:8)

I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last. (Revelation 22:13)?


2
According to various sources, including the Planck Collaboration, the age of the universe is estimated to be around 13.8 billion years old. This estimate is based on various observations and calculations involving the expansion rate of the universe, the cosmic microwave background radiation, and the distribution of matter in the universe. Prior to 1999, astronomers had estimated that the age of the universe was between 7 and 20 billion years, but with advances in technology and the development of new methods for measuring the age of the universe, this estimate has been refined to this current value.


3
1 Corinthians 3:19
This is the goal towards which the sixth age of humanity will strive: the popularization of occult truth on a wide scale. That's the mission of this age and the society that unites spiritually has the task of bringing this occult truth to life everywhere and applying it directly. That's exactly what our age is missing.
User avatar
AshvinP
Posts: 5462
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:00 am
Location: USA

Re: The Nature of the sensory world or do we really *know* the ultimate ground of reality?

Post by AshvinP »

Federica wrote: Sat Mar 25, 2023 2:32 pm
Cleric K wrote: Sun Mar 19, 2023 7:03 pm Let’s continue with the theme of light. As hinted, we can’t go very far by trying to understand light (and this goes for the physical world as a whole) by imagining particles and fields, no matter how subtle, ‘made of’ consciousness and so on. This probably sounds insulting to the ears of the scientifically minded people of today. But it shouldn’t be if we understand the deeper reasons.

In close connection with the above quoted second episode of the meaning of the phenomenon of light, there are now Max Leyf's reflections on the same topic to consider. I personally have some difficulties getting them, at least at first read. Anthony, if you see this, would you please share what your understanding is of the given illustration of the meaning of light? Anyone else?

Max Leyf wrote:
relativistic spacetime and the essence of Light

“A man may fish with the worm that hath eat of a king, and eat of the fish that hath fed of that worm,” as Hamlet says

Thanks for sharing Max's essay, Federica! I found it a very nice summary of what Cleric also was writing about from another, somewhat more explicitly spiritual, perspective on the nature of Light. Basically, we could say it all points towards what happens and what we aim for when we train for higher cognition - we evolve towards the more holistic perspective which stands behind the physical Sun and its Light. Put another way, we progressively awaken to our actual identity with this Sun-perspective, which normally slumbers in our sub- or supra-conscious. We should keep in mind that this is no mere symbolism - we are really speaking of the intentional, supra-intelligent Soul-Spirit essence which animates the Earth and all its kingdoms in very precise ways which can be discerned scientifically, and which normal science like GR has discerned in a very dim, abstract way through the 'laws of nature' (which it is gradually realizing are not so absolute and fixed from the perspective of our relativistic spacetime consciousness).

I recently re-encountered the following from Steiner which may shed some more Light on the topic. It is an example of how we can truly understand our individual and collective streams of becoming as living manifestations of these higher-order perspectives which grasp our spacetime states of being as something more holistic, just as we can meditatively work on grasping our own streams of thought more holistically like the notes of a musical melody.

You see from this that very many impulses of transformation as regards the spiritual life are coming forward in our time. For here we see something evolving that is like a human being except that it has a longer duration of life than an individual man. ... A Being evolves upwards of whom we can say: if we look at the very first beginnings of Grecian philosophy this Being has then just reached the stage of development which corresponds in mankind to puberty; as Being it is like man when he has reached the 14th – 16th year. Then it lives upwards to the time when a human being experiences the events between the 14th and 21st year; that is the age of Greek philosophy, Greek thought. Then comes the next 7 years, what man experiences from the age of 21 to 28; the Christ Impulse enters the development of philosophy. Then comes the period from Scotus Erigena up to the new age. This Being develops in the following 700 – 800 years what man develops between the ages of 28 and 35 years. And now we are living in the development of what man experiences in his consciousness soul: we are experiencing the consciousness soul of philosophy, of philosophical thought.

Philosophy has actually come to the forties, only it is a Being that has much longer duration of life. One year in a man's life corresponds to a hundred years in the life of the Being of philosophy. So we see a Being passing through history for whom a century is a year; evolving in accordance with Sun-laws though one is not aware of it... Yes, my dear friends, something of this was only felt by Christian Morgenstern. And by feeling this, feeling it in the deepest part of his soul, our friend Christian Morgenstern could put into writing a beautiful sentiment...

Lucifer

“I'll keep my light from light of your excluded,
I want you not, your light shall be precluded,
Until my light's my own and separated.

So do I bring the Evil to expression
As Spirit of negation, self-possession,
Yet is new world by ranks of mine created.

By off'ing to un-erring Beings resistance,
A race of err-ant gods has found existence
Who act on their — and not your — discretion.

Who have not walked in Truth from the beginning
Who only reach the Truth through suffering, sinning,
Who only read the truth through sin's transgression.”
"Most people would sooner regard themselves as a piece of lava in the moon than as an 'I'"
User avatar
Federica
Posts: 1716
Joined: Sat May 14, 2022 2:30 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: The Nature of the sensory world or do we really *know* the ultimate ground of reality?

Post by Federica »

AshvinP wrote: Sat Mar 25, 2023 3:53 pm Thanks for sharing Max's essay, Federica! I found it a very nice summary of what Cleric also was writing about from another, somewhat more explicitly spiritual, perspective on the nature of Light. Basically, we could say it all points towards what happens and what we aim for when we train for higher cognition - we evolve towards the more holistic perspective which stands behind the physical Sun and its Light. Put another way, we progressively awaken to our actual identity with this Sun-perspective, which normally slumbers in our sub- or supra-conscious. We should keep in mind that this is no mere symbolism - we are really speaking of the intentional, supra-intelligent Soul-Spirit essence which animates the Earth and all its kingdoms in very precise ways which can be discerned scientifically, and which normal science like GR has discerned in a very dim, abstract way through the 'laws of nature' (which it is gradually realizing are not so absolute and fixed from the perspective of our relativistic spacetime consciousness).

I recently re-encountered the following from Steiner which may shed some more Light on the topic. It is an example of how we can truly understand our individual and collective streams of becoming as living manifestations of these higher-order perspectives which grasp our spacetime states of being as something more holistic, just as we can meditatively work on grasping our own streams of thought more holistically like the notes of a musical melody.

You see from this that very many impulses of transformation as regards the spiritual life are coming forward in our time. For here we see something evolving that is like a human being except that it has a longer duration of life than an individual man. ... A Being evolves upwards of whom we can say: if we look at the very first beginnings of Grecian philosophy this Being has then just reached the stage of development which corresponds in mankind to puberty; as Being it is like man when he has reached the 14th – 16th year. Then it lives upwards to the time when a human being experiences the events between the 14th and 21st year; that is the age of Greek philosophy, Greek thought. Then comes the next 7 years, what man experiences from the age of 21 to 28; the Christ Impulse enters the development of philosophy. Then comes the period from Scotus Erigena up to the new age. This Being develops in the following 700 – 800 years what man develops between the ages of 28 and 35 years. And now we are living in the development of what man experiences in his consciousness soul: we are experiencing the consciousness soul of philosophy, of philosophical thought.

Philosophy has actually come to the forties, only it is a Being that has much longer duration of life. One year in a man's life corresponds to a hundred years in the life of the Being of philosophy. So we see a Being passing through history for whom a century is a year; evolving in accordance with Sun-laws though one is not aware of it... Yes, my dear friends, something of this was only felt by Christian Morgenstern. And by feeling this, feeling it in the deepest part of his soul, our friend Christian Morgenstern could put into writing a beautiful sentiment...

Lucifer

“I'll keep my light from light of your excluded,
I want you not, your light shall be precluded,
Until my light's my own and separated.

So do I bring the Evil to expression
As Spirit of negation, self-possession,
Yet is new world by ranks of mine created.

By off'ing to un-erring Beings resistance,
A race of err-ant gods has found existence
Who act on their — and not your — discretion.

Who have not walked in Truth from the beginning
Who only reach the Truth through suffering, sinning,
Who only read the truth through sin's transgression.”


Thank you, Ashvin. Yes, I see the connection with the more explicit spiritual perspective, although quite vaguely.
When it comes to understanding the essay, my difficulty was mainly depending on only having an intuitive, vague, too generic understanding of special relativity. So I've asked Youtube for help, and now I do understand and appreciate what the essay points to. Unfortunately for me, and this is all me, I now also have opinions, of course, about the minutiae of vocabulary, like for instance that "postulates", which annoys me a little, but I think the least I can do is try to come to terms with myself with regards to this. :D
This is the goal towards which the sixth age of humanity will strive: the popularization of occult truth on a wide scale. That's the mission of this age and the society that unites spiritually has the task of bringing this occult truth to life everywhere and applying it directly. That's exactly what our age is missing.
User avatar
Cleric K
Posts: 1653
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2021 9:40 pm

Re: Meditation exercise on "separate me"

Post by Cleric K »

Anthony66 wrote: Mon Mar 13, 2023 12:46 pm The perspective offered here is very helpful but then I can't see how it translates into mundane phenomena like blocking a stream of light with an opaque filter.
To continue our investigation in the nature of the sensory world we have no choice but go into some of the concrete details of initiatic science. This however requires certain determination and effort. Normally whole books have to be studied in order to begin forming intuition of the supra-sensory realms which are the basis of everything sensory. Here I’ll try to present a simple and consequently quite limited analogy but hopefully it may be of help to point us towards these foundational intuitions.

The metaphor

I’ll make use once again of the Moiré patterns as a metaphor. As a refresher you may look at videos like this, this and this. So basically these patterns arise either as an aliasing effect, which is a problem mainly in photography where the resolution is insufficient to capture the fine details of the object, or when we have the interference of two meshes (like in the videos). Now let’s imagine something more complicated. We can imagine a sock made of fine material and we can wrap it like so:

Image

Now by moving the wrapped fabric against itself it becomes possible to form Moiré patterns. But we can do that once more. Now we have a second order pattern so to speak. To make it more complicated we can imagine that the first wrapping is able to move independently and simultaneously with the second.

This would be the basic metaphor. Now the big problem is – metaphor for what? Of course, we can very easily answer “for the folding of the Divine Consciousness” but this seems so abstract, it’s like speaking of multiverses, branes, strings and so on. It all remains only a floating picture in our intellect. And the thing is that even higher consciousness doesn’t present to us reality in such a convenient third-person perspective of the spiritual fabric of existence which folds onto itself. This is the fallacy of which we have spoken million times – about forgetting that our conscious perspective can never separate itself from the manifold of reality and observe it from the side. Thus we’re in the difficult situation that we’re trying to make sense of something within which all our thoughts, feelings, will, perceptions are intertwined. Yet we have no choice but try.

So the first thing is that all we’re describing is supposed to make sense of our first-person spiritual experience. Simply holding an abstract model of reality in our intellect will always seem dry and disconnected from our living experience. Our thoughts through which we would think such a model are themselves the Moiré patterns that we try to grasp in their deeper nature. So first we need to equip ourselves with the needed humility that the experience of what interferes is not readily available in our ordinary consciousness. If we expect to understand these things by thinking abstractly about them, we only make more and more complicated combinations of the patterns but this doesn’t in itself lead us closer to the conscious experience of the interfering sheets.

So today we find ourselves in a four-fold situation. There are many ways in which this is discernible. It will take us too far to go in full details, yet we could think of the four kingdoms – mineral, plant, animal, man –, the four elements, the four stages of cognition – intellectual, Imaginative, Inspirative, Intuitive –, the forces of our soul life – willing, feeling, thinking, sensing –, the four sheaths – physical, life, soul, spiritual – and so on.

The metaphor helps us to conceive that each fold doesn’t simply add linearly to the latter, but each convolution wraps everything that has existed so far. In a way, everything is multiplied. Look at the second fold in the image. It’s interesting that the first fold is to be found both on the inside and the outside of the second. As said, this shouldn’t be read too literally into, since we’re not trying to make a model of reality but it helps us avoid imagining the convolutions as linearly stacked one over the other. Everything is within everything, everything interpenetrates everything. So in this sense the folding that we describe here is not some spatial happening, as if one half of the Cosmos spatially moves and folds onto the other but is a matter of change in inner relations.

The inner experience of the folds

Our state today is the most complicated. There are four folds and we have to imagine that each of them can move independently. This can help us grasp something of the natural hierarchy that emerges in this way. If the first fold moves, this has an effect on all consequent folds. On the other hand, the second fold doesn’t influence the first so much, although it certainly feeds back on it. It has to be reminded over and over again that these are simple analogies, fairy tales if you will. They are supposed to stimulate certain intuition. If we continue to look at them too literally, we’ll immediately stumble upon unsolvable paradoxes.

The first fold of the fabric would correspond to a state of existence which from our present perspective can be likened only to very deep dreamless sleep. That’s how little of that primordial spiritual state we can grasp with our present patterns of consciousness. Yet we should try to at least asymptotically approach that state, which can indeed become consciously known through proper development and at its own level is anything but dark unconsciousness. In fact it is supremely richer and Cosmic compared to anything we can experience within Earthly consciousness.

Let’s try this. Let’s picture a state of reality which is folded in that still simple way. What would that be like? To approach that we have to gradually let go of almost everything which gives the support of our present existence. We should imagine our bodily sensations dissolve, there’s no Earth, no Sun, no planets, there’s no body of personal desires, there’s no life in the sense of processes of growth and reproduction. What is left is a boundless space of rich proto spiritual experience and the will of becoming. This experience is not simply our personal but is the Cosmic archetypal world inherent in all more convoluted and differentiated forms of existence. This spiritual space is not filled with atoms and photons. We can’t even speak of spatiality, we can’t say how dimensional that space is. Neither is it a subjective experience of the ‘true’ space out there. All of such things can be conceived only later when the intellect comes into being. To this the modern thinker would respond almost by reflex: “But just because this primordial state is incapable of conceiving atoms it doesn’t mean that they don’t exist. It might be that this primitive state is still too undeveloped in order to grasp the real contents of the Cosmos. It may simply not have the needed senses and cognition in order to grasp anything beyond itself. The atoms may have been there all along.” In a way this is a logical objection. The answer however lies in the nature of this primordial state. Even though we describe that state as reached by dissolving our present form of being, this doesn’t lead into a more indeterminate state but instead into a more encompassing one. In a way, the intellect conceives of outer space and atoms because it justifiably feels that there’s a lot going on beyond our skin. What is not understood however is that this more primordial state extends precisely into this ‘beyond our skin’ and that’s how we find the true nature of the outer world – that which the intellect tries to understand through assemblies of thoughts in the head with which it tries to fill the void that it fully lawfully feels.

Here we should mention that the foldings that we’re describing shouldn’t be taken as the actual description of how evolution looked like from the perspective of man. There are many things that have to be understood in details for that. Instead, we’re examining these states somewhat artificially, taking advantage of the fact that we’re today in position to know something of them. We do that by describing the moving in and out of these stages of foldness but let’s keep in mind that these in and out movements shouldn’t be taken as completely identical to what a proper description of the actual evolutionary movements would be. As a simple analogy, we can today picture our state of being along any age, we can go back and forth between young age and our present age but this movement is not identical to the movement through which we indeed reached our present stage. In reality, our human perspective has not yet been conscious through the initial foldings. Other beings are responsible for them. We only now awaken within an already quite complicated manifold and we can only understand our present stage if we comprehend how these folds manifest in our experience. We need to understand something of these folds, each of which is an eon of evolution and which since antiquity were known by the names Saturn condition, Sun condition, Moon condition, Earth condition – not to be confused with our present planetary bodies with the same names. It might be of interest to mention that such occult facts have been concealed by the initiates in many places such as the names of the days of week – Saturn-day, Sun-day, Moon-day.

Nested Time

Here someone may say: “What do I care about the history of evolution? What counts is the here and now. The past may be curious to learn about but all that matters is in the present.” This is only half right. It is perfectly true that we can only grow into reality from what is real in the present moment. In that sense, the historical sciences as they are practiced today in a purely intellectual manner, are indeed only arrangements of flimsy mental images. With this view it is natural that we should feel our mental picture of the past to be unreal in comparison to our living experience here and now. But the past that we talk about has to be grasped in a very different way. Our whole folding metaphor already hints that this past is not actually gone by but is present also in the now. If we imagine these folding eons as historical events along the arrow of time, they will naturally feel as long gone by and, well, in the past. But things are not of exactly this sort and herein lies the greatest challenge for the modern mind – to comprehend the mystery of Time. We can render the folding process in an alternative way:

Image

For clarity, on the left the eons are depicted linearly. At the top we have the beginning of Time – the emergence of our evolutionary scenario from the potential of Eternity. Then there’s expansion of the initial interference, followed by contraction, where everything manifested becomes spiritualized once again. We have spoken before that these periods were well known by the ancients and were called Pralaya (Sanskrit word).

To link this to the idea of folding, the same thing is depicted on the right but now, just like the sock, the second eon unfolds within the context of the first. Then new expansion begins but in a certain sense it is enwrapped in everything that has been developed in the first eon, except that the latter is not simply an inert relic of a past stage but continues to develop in its own right. Then we have to imagine a similar process until we reach our fourth eon.

In this way we see that the four eons cannot be thought of as simply following one another. In certain sense it is so but at the same time every next eon manifests as a convolution/folding of everything that has been developed so far. Yes, these things are mind bending for the modern intellect who has become only too comfortable with the clockwork vision of reality. As noted many times, this vision is not limited to materialism. Idealistic views are equally affected by it. Take for example Bernardo’s vision, which is practically identical to the materialistic view of a Big Bang, followed by coalescence of matter. The only difference in the idealistic case is that this progression is conceived from the inner side, so to speak. There’s the spiritual Big Bang of MAL which then coalesces into dissociated islands of consciousness. Yet both approaches implicitly operate under the conception of an arrow of time along which this progression unfolds. No matter whether we’re a materialist or an idealist, the event of the Big Bang – whether physical or spiritual – is only conceived as a mental picture of some past event long gone by. Is there any surprise then that we feel these questions about past and future to be inherently uncertain and only preventing us to find reality in the here and now?

If we understand the folding metaphor it should be clear that the past is still present in the now. We need to comprehend this folding not simply to satisfy some intellectual curiosity but because it is our true structure here and now. We can’t understand our situation today if we’re unable to differentiate in our experience what proceeds from Saturn man, what from Sun man, what from Moon man and what from Earth man.

This is also the greatest challenge for those who absolutize Oneness. It is true that simply speculating intellectually about such things only throws around abstract debris in our soul. That’s why people feel that they attain to deeper reality when they unite with their soul which is like a coherent container of otherwise fragmentary phenomena. This is indisputable. We indeed need this realization that in our intellectual life we’re continually dying, we are fragmenting and ossifying our life. But if we absolutize this unity of our inner life we lose all means to know the deeper reality of the soul. Then we simply take the fourfold manifold in its flattened experience and call it the foundation of reality. It has to be understood with perfect clarity that the true knowledge of the folds of our existence is not intellectual fragmentation. These folds are already there. When we recognize the reality of thinking, feeling and willing, we’re simply forming concepts about what is already a fact of our present stage of existence. If just because we want everything to be One, we say “Yeah but these forces are really one and the same”, then we simply smear them out and contemplate a completely flattened experience of reality, losing all means to know how our consciousness comes to be what it is. We simply assume the way our present consciousness feels (even if ‘enlightened’), to be a fundamental axiom of existence.

Higher cognition as consciousness of the folds

Through the folding metaphor we can also very clearly understand what higher cognition is about. As said, our Earthly stage of existence is the most convoluted. Our intellectual thoughts are Moiré patterns over Moiré patterns. When we think and perceive, we have the degrees of freedom to manipulate only this most recent fold. On the contrary, our life of will exists in the most ancient fold, which is simultaneously both the physical and spiritual foundation of our reality.

The stages of higher cognition can be likened to the unfolding of the folds. For example, we attain to the Imaginative stage when we, so to speak, unfold the Earthly convolution and find ourselves in a state similar to the Moon condition. Normally the interference of the Moon sheets are the basis for the Moiré patterns that form our Earthly consciousness. We’re barely conscious of this deeper soul life in the present age. But if we unfold the Earthly folding, then we glimpse at something of our higher being, which has its self-consciousness in the Moon sheets. At that level, spiritual activity weaves in the soul strata as consciously as we do that with our thoughts in the Earth condition. Similarly, unfolding the other foldings leads us to the stages of Inspirative and Intuitive consciousness.

Of course, this unfolding is not yet the true unfolding which will only happen in the long course of evolution. The four folds for our Earthly being are present at all times while we’re in deep meditation. Then how is higher cognition possible? It is possible through harmonizing the spiritual activity at the different folds. In modern man these folds are quite out of tune. They are like independent pendulums, producing the most bizarre Moiré patterns. We think one thing, our heart desires another, our will does third. Higher development consists in the fully conscious and strenuous alignment of these pendulums. Thus we need to bring the fourth fold (in which we’re most conscious) in full attunement to the third such that they move as one so to speak. They are still distinct but are temporarily synchronized. The fourth fold sacrifices itself and allows to be moved by the sheet of the third. This is also what allows for the intellectual self to have consciousness of the higher realms because it is not simply destroyed but it becomes resonantly attuned to the movements of the deeper folds. When we experience these higher movements and corresponding higher intuitions, they evoke images, analogies, metaphors in the intellectual fold. Of course, this process of attunement is not linear. We always have to work on the perfection of all folds simultaneously because they are interdependent. Nevertheless, there's a certain gradation. As it should be obvious from the metaphor the Intuitive stage of cognition requires the most perfect attunement – all folds have to be synchronized such that we can live consciously in the most primordial. The independent activity of all later folds is sacrificed and synchronized with the most ancient so that we can move consciously in it. In this way we understand in a completely experiential way how our more convoluted forms of existence come about. As soon as some of the folds begin to move relative to each other, this produces the Moiré patterns and we find ourselves again in a more convoluted consciousness, where we lose awareness of the interfering realities but remain only with the resulting patterns.

Parallel between higher development and stages after death

After death each one of us will go through these deconvolutions as the physical, etheric and astral bodies are released. This however is again not the full unfolding. Even after death we exist in the fourfold context. Our physical fold – the inner experience of sensory life – is still there but it is released from the bounds of our body and expands to become our Cosmic environment. In the body this sensory life feels contracted. We feel our heart here, we feel a color in our head, smell in our nose and so on. After death this sensory spectrum is released, expands and becomes our Cosmic environment. Then it feels as if the color phenomena of our incarnate life have been gathered and contracted from this direction of the Cosmos, taste from that direction and so on (of course, here direction no longer has spatial sense). But the point is that after death these folds still exist. In fact, the imperfect alignment of the folds is what grows into the new Earthly existence (remember the analogy with the Big Bang where the imperfections in the quantum foam produce the clumped structure of galaxies, instead of fully uniform distribution of matter and energy). The actual unfolding of the folds happens only in the course of eons of evolution and is known in esoteric terms as the three future stages – Jupiter condition, Venus condition, Vulcan condition. In a certain sense these conditions are the undoing of the corresponding primordial foldings – Jupiter undoes the Moon condition, Venus undoes the Sun condition and Vulcan undoes the Saturn condition. Of course, this unfolding is not simply the primordial stages but gone in reverse. It is a fully conscious evolutionary process which has to creatively work for this unfoldment and every step is experienced as something completely new.

It has to be repeated that as we move towards the more fundamental folds, all existence becomes more and more universal. Our perspectives are most personalized (multiplied) in the present most convoluted fourth fold but towards the end of the Vulcan condition there's practically one being of whole humanity known as Atman.

Everything is interconnected

We can see how interconnected everything is. We can’t simply take one thing and understand it in isolation. For example, if we want to understand in isolation how an animal comes about, this assumes that we already have the proper perspective, that we know what the container of reality is, and simply want to see how forms take shape within this container, in the way a sculptor gives form to his creations. Alas, we can never reach reality in this way. These foldings are the most critical thing to gain intuition of if we want to find our upright stance in reality. And we can find that intuition only if we comprehend in the most intimate way how our present existence is a manifestation of these folds. If we simply smear everything out and enjoy the oneness, we in fact remain in the most convoluted state and confuse it for the ground of reality.

We haven’t yet spoken about the more concrete details of how the mineral nature of our Earthly stage comes about but it was necessary to first address the above questions because without this foundation nothing else can ever be comprehended. It is inevitable that initially all these folds, eons and so on will sound only as the most abstract and fantastic notions. But gradually we can recognize their concrete manifestations in our living experience and we find completely new ways to orient ourselves within reality, which attains depth that could not have been even conceived before.
Post Reply