Intuitive Idealism vs. Analytic Idealism (Part II): An alternative formulation of idealism

Any topics primarily focused on metaphysics can be discussed here, in a generally casual way, where conversations may take unexpected turns.
User avatar
AshvinP
Posts: 5510
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:00 am
Location: USA

Re: Intuitive Idealism vs. Analytic Idealism (Part II): An alternative formulation of idealism

Post by AshvinP »

Soul_of_Shu wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 5:01 pm
AshvinP wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 4:40 pmIt is not essentially possible, I would say, yet there are differing qualities of Mirror, some which do not reflect the Light back to their Source as purely as others.
Good ol' Dad, aka yours truly, is on a Mirror-refining journey of Self-perpetuating revelation, until all those poor, hapless, ignorant others are realized as the Light they were never actually not ... Yes, even the Taliban! :mrgreen:

Are you basically asking, "why did any of this need to happen if we are all One in essence?" Isn't that just a variation of the "why is there something rather than nothing?" question?
"A secret law contrives,
To give time symmetry:
There is, within our lives,
An exact mystery."
User avatar
Soul_of_Shu
Posts: 2023
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2021 6:48 pm
Contact:

Re: Intuitive Idealism vs. Analytic Idealism (Part II): An alternative formulation of idealism

Post by Soul_of_Shu »

AshvinP wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 6:54 pmAre you basically asking, "why did any of this need to happen if we are all One in essence?"

Not really ... Part of the Revelation is that it's happening because it can't not happen, so that question is a moot point. The challenge now being WTF to make of it, if Bodhisattva bound?
Here out of instinct or grace we seek
soulmates in these galleries of hieroglyph and glass,
where mutual longings and sufferings of love
are laid bare in transfigured exhibition of our hearts,
we who crave deep secrets and mysteries,
as elusive as the avatars of our dreams.
User avatar
Cleric K
Posts: 1662
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2021 9:40 pm

Re: Intuitive Idealism vs. Analytic Idealism (Part II): An alternative formulation of idealism

Post by Cleric K »

Eugene I wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 4:37 pm
AshvinP wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 2:30 pm As it keeps happening, I will keep pointing it out - red assertion is completely contradicted by blue one. And the "collective subconscious" cannot be equated with personal "projections".

Obviously, from the perspective of unreliable NDE-OBE accounts further complicated by the fact that they are using abstract culturally-conditioned 2-D concepts to describe their 3-D and 4-D experiences, it will inevitably be "inconsistent" and seem as "dream-like projections" (also there is no reason to assume our actual dreaming states do not lift us into higher realms). These are truly trivial observations being made. The fact that you are still assuming Cleric has not factored this repetitive "point" into his understanding still astounds and confounds me.
IMO Cleric's knowing-experiences are similar to Franklin Merrell-Wolff and Bob Monroe and many others' and are similarly individual and collective subconscious projections/manifestations culturally conditioned by his Christian beliefs (so, in his case, projections of collective Christian faith archetypes). There is an abundance of similar visionary experiences from Christian mystics and ordinary believers over the history, for example, List of Marian apparitions. I'm not suggesting they are personal hallucinations, it is more likely that there are beyond-physical realm beings participating in the manifestations of these evens, but what those beings are projecting to us is a manifested reality based on their collective conscious and unconscious intentions and beliefs.

Many NDE experiencers described the beyond-physical realm as the community of conscious beings voluntarily grouped in a variety of "groups of interest", every group having their own perspectives, values, intentions etc. This physical reality is governed by rather structured rules possibly imposed by the Source, but in spite of the seeming rigid rules and structures there is a lot of flexibility in how the physical reality is manifested, and all groups of interest participate in its manifestation and the way it unfolds. Also, there groups have their residential" sub-realms in the beyond-physical realm (so Christian souls reside in a paradise-like realm with Christ as their "Sun Man" local group leader, Buddhists reside in Pure-Land realms led by the Buddhas, Anthroposophists reside in the realm described by Cleric and also connected to and governed by Christ, and so on). So if someone, based on their beliefs and dispositions, belong to one of the groups (say Christian, Anthroposophical, Buddhis etc) they will experience the beyond-physical reality according to their groups beliefs, values and intentions. What this means that the beyond-physical reality is multifold and multi-realm, and a lot of NDE experiences confirm that quite explicitly.

So where are we all as a community of incarnate and discarnate souls heading, what is the telos of all this reality? Is it the integration into the highest Self of the Sun Man, of Buddhist nirvana, or Advaitic dissolution into the Cosmic Consciousness? Is there a common universal goal/destination where all creation is heading? I like the way Steve Petermann phraised it in one of his essays: "God chose to experience life in all its forms". This is the telos of God's/MAL creation and life.

The point is, we can choose to ignore the NDE, OBE and clairvoyance evidences as unreliable, and that's fine, but in this case I don't see why we would be cherry-picking and rejecting the evidences of a huge number of these experiences while still holding the similar Cleric's experiences as true. But we can also choose to be open to these evidences, but in this case again why would we give more credibility to Cleric's experiences and discard the rest of the evidences?
I've addressed this several times already. In Spiritual training we quickly learn that to see into the invisible is not at all about gaining access to some complete and fully explained image. Think about what it would be for a man born blind who has an operation that restores his sight. Naively we may think that he'll immediately see like everyone else but this is not what happens. He would be confronted with a undifferentiated colorful amalgamation and would have to slowly and gradually learn to associate concepts with various color patterns. He may already have concepts like 'table' and 'chair' thanks to his other senses but he'll have to learn to connect these concepts with completely new color experiences.

We're in much the same situation when we begin spiritual training. The higher experiences can only slowly and gradually be connected with concepts. The more we do that, the more clearly we perceive.

NDEs, psychedelic experiences, etc. don't give us directly the proper concepts. We can only translate into understanding that which succeeds to connect with concepts that we already possess from our ordinary life. Nanci for example had read quite some New Age books, so she already had a rich conceptual palette when her NDE occured. So this is the first thing - every person can extract from NDEs and other such states, only as much as can be translated into their conceptual palette. (Even Terence McKenna said "Psychedelics Don't Work On Stupid People" :D )

Another thing is that the astral world is not some place of pure truth. Everything there is living, made of living conscious beings but these beings are of the most varied kinds and have different goals of their own. Ironically, the beings that are the first to reflect their nature in Imaginations, to the person having the accidental glimpse, are those beings whose nature inspire in humans exactly these traits that we call lies and deception. They are the first to approach us, simply because our whole Earthly realm is tightly knitted with these beings. Everyone today realizes how much lies and deception reign everywhere in human life - starting with the relations with those closest to us, passing through immoral business practices, theft, fraud, going through politics ... We've enveloped ourselves in a thick aura of lies and deception that hovers like thick astral smog within the souls of humans. Without high ideal, without ever pondering the questions of good and evil, accidental visitors in the higher realms simply don't have criteria to distinguish true from false. If they are presented two Imaginations one representing a truthful fact about the higher realms, the other being just a fantastic picture, to which one would the human be drawn? Well, to the one that seems more sympathetic, that is more desirable. And this is rarely the truthful one. We don't even need esoteric science here. We can see these human qualities directly within the Earthly life. If people on Earth see clearly the truth and the lie, and still choose the lie because it will helps them, for example, to rise the corporate ladder, to get the woman they want, to put down their rival, and so on, how much more that same humans would choose the object of their desire in the invisible world, where they don't even readily see the difference between true and false?

That's why no attempts should be made for penetrating the higher worlds without strong moral feeling and healthy sense of truth. These qualities are developed in the sensory world first. If we can't think correctly, we don't stand a chance to recognize true from false in the higher worlds. We need to develop our thinking to such an extent that an incorrect thought should cause us actual pain. And on the contrary, truthful thought should be experienced as gladdening, giving us warm feeling. If in our ordinary life we place our sympathies first, if we simply follow our desires, true and false will be completely indistinguishable for us. We can only orient ourselves there if we have high ideal and we always place what is true, noble, beneficial for the whole, above our personal inclinations.

So it's not a surprise that NDE reports are very different and often conflicting. There are other factors too, but even the two above already give us quite a good idea why such reports should always be considered with the utmost caution.

Otherwise, the 'interest groups' and the 'flexibility' don't at all contradict what Spiritual investigation reveals. There really is differentiation of souls, even though they gradually perfect all their aspects. And about the flexibility - well, in reality there's no more restricted state that the one we experience in the moment. People think they are unrestricted just because they see around them 3D space that they feel can freely explore in all directions. But in reality, if we could draw a trace map of the points in space that we visit, we'll realize that we're actually much more puppets on strings than we have imagined. If we include also a psychic map we would find in horror that most of our daily states are actually quite determined much like oscillating as Lissajous figures. We're treading the same old thoughts and feelings, repeating the same habitual movements. It's only because we don't perceive the looped forms we continuously experience, that we don't realize how restricted and channeled our lives really are. Even the lowest servant of the Kingdom experiences infinitely more freedom than this. As the wise Masters say "you haven't even begun to Live yet". And that's true, what we have here is only a preparation for the creative life of the Spirit. But we shouldn't forget that it is up to us to undertake the work that will lead us to that Life. We might as well succumb even deeper into mechanization and truly pre-programmed flow of states of being.
User avatar
AshvinP
Posts: 5510
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:00 am
Location: USA

Re: Intuitive Idealism vs. Analytic Idealism (Part II): An alternative formulation of idealism

Post by AshvinP »

Soul_of_Shu wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 7:16 pm
AshvinP wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 6:54 pmAre you basically asking, "why did any of this need to happen if we are all One in essence?"

Not really ... Part of the Revelation is that it's happening because it can't not happen, so that question is a moot point. The challenge now being WTF to make of it, if Bodhisattva bound?

Well that's the sort of question Cleric is trying to answer with his detailed and dynamic posts, and me in my much more feeble attempts with essays surveying mythology, philosophy, etc. via the metamorphic progression, which is really the most useful concept for the intellect to internalize IMO. There are no ready-made or neatly packaged answers like we tend to crave in modern society, although there are definitely fantastic moments when the Spirit lifts the veil from our eyes, and it feels everything falls into place in the most aesthetically pleasing way. It is my experience that these moments become more frequent the more it is pursued with devotion, prayer, open heart, and open mind. And that is only from the level of abstract intellect and reason, so just think what it can be at stages of true Imaginative thinking (as we see reflected in Cleric's vivid illustrations here).

"But we shouldn't forget that it is up to us to undertake the work that will lead us to that Life." - Cleric
"A secret law contrives,
To give time symmetry:
There is, within our lives,
An exact mystery."
User avatar
Eugene I
Posts: 1484
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2021 9:49 pm

Re: Intuitive Idealism vs. Analytic Idealism (Part II): An alternative formulation of idealism

Post by Eugene I »

Cleric K wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 9:10 pm NDEs, psychedelic experiences, etc. don't give us directly the proper concepts. We can only translate into understanding that which succeeds to connect with concepts that we already possess from our ordinary life. Nanci for example had read quite some New Age books, so she already had a rich conceptual palette when her NDE occured. So this is the first thing - every person can extract from NDEs and other such states, only as much as can be translated into their conceptual palette. (Even Terence McKenna said "Psychedelics Don't Work On Stupid People" :D )
Right, that's also what I was saying. And it's not only that there are some independent reality that is only filtered through our conceptual palettes, but (in the discarnate realms) the very perceived reality is in most part a result of the manifestation of that palette by us and the beings sharing with us the same palette ("interest group"), and this is because the palette extends deep into the subconscious and carries our intentions and expectations that are part of the palette. But the same applies to your experiences: you have certain conceptual palette shaped by your Christian and Antroposophic background, so the beyond-physical reality you are experiencing is the result of the manifestation and translation of this palette by you and the beings from your "interest group" there.
Another thing is that the astral world is not some place of pure truth. Everything there is living, made of living conscious beings but these beings are of the most varied kinds and have different goals of their own. Ironically, the beings that are the first to reflect their nature in Imaginations, to the person having the accidental glimpse, are those beings whose nature inspire in humans exactly these traits that we call lies and deception. They are the first to approach us, simply because our whole Earthly realm is tightly knitted with these beings. Everyone today realizes how much lies and deception reign everywhere in human life - starting with the relations with those closest to us, passing through immoral business practices, theft, fraud, going through politics ... We've enveloped ourselves in a thick aura of lies and deception that hovers like thick astral smog within the souls of humans. Without high ideal, without ever pondering the questions of good and evil, accidental visitors in the higher realms simply don't have criteria to distinguish true from false. If they are presented two Imaginations one representing a truthful fact about the higher realms, the other being just a fantastic picture, to which one would the human be drawn? Well, to the one that seems more sympathetic, that is more desirable. And this is rarely the truthful one. We don't even need esoteric science here. We can see these human qualities directly within the Earthly life. If people on Earth see clearly the truth and the lie, and still choose the lie because it will helps them, for example, to rise the corporate ladder, to get the woman they want, to put down their rival, and so on, how much more that same humans would choose the object of their desire in the invisible world, where they don't even readily see the difference between true and false?

That's why no attempts should be made for penetrating the higher worlds without strong moral feeling and healthy sense of truth. These qualities are developed in the sensory world first. If we can't think correctly, we don't stand a chance to recognize true from false in the higher worlds. We need to develop our thinking to such an extent that an incorrect thought should cause us actual pain. And on the contrary, truthful thought should be experienced as gladdening, giving us warm feeling. If in our ordinary life we place our sympathies first, if we simply follow our desires, true and false will be completely indistinguishable for us. We can only orient ourselves there if we have high ideal and we always place what is true, noble, beneficial for the whole, above our personal inclinations.
Right, I agree, there are "interest groups" with egoic and evil intents and we, whether in incarnate or discarnate form, can be greatly influenced by them. This is the "collective madness" phenomenon.
So it's not a surprise that NDE reports are very different and often conflicting. There are other factors too, but even the two above already give us quite a good idea why such reports should always be considered with the utmost caution.
Exactly, but the same applies to your experiences as well.
Otherwise, the 'interest groups' and the 'flexibility' don't at all contradict what Spiritual investigation reveals. There really is differentiation of souls, even though they gradually perfect all their aspects. And about the flexibility - well, in reality there's no more restricted state that the one we experience in the moment. People think they are unrestricted just because they see around them 3D space that they feel can freely explore in all directions. But in reality, if we could draw a trace map of the points in space that we visit, we'll realize that we're actually much more puppets on strings than we have imagined. If we include also a psychic map we would find in horror that most of our daily states are actually quite determined much like oscillating as Lissajous figures. We're treading the same old thoughts and feelings, repeating the same habitual movements. It's only because we don't perceive the looped forms we continuously experience, that we don't realize how restricted and channeled our lives really are. Even the lowest servant of the Kingdom experiences infinitely more freedom than this. As the wise Masters say "you haven't even begun to Live yet". And that's true, what we have here is only a preparation for the creative life of the Spirit. But we shouldn't forget that it is up to us to undertake the work that will lead us to that Life. We might as well succumb even deeper into mechanization and truly pre-programmed flow of states of being.
Right, we live in reality of restricted freedom. Like Steve phrased it: "life is a restricted existence", yet not restricted enough to deprive us from the freedom of choice, and there is still a lot of room to exercise that freedom even within the restrictions. The more conscious, lucidly aware and meta-conscious we are, the more we can realize and exercise the freedom of our free will. Just like in the lucid dream we can significantly influence the course of the dream, while we can not do that if we dream un-lucidly. But without meanings and values the freedom of choice is random and pointless and can lead to more suffering, so the essential part of the meaningful freedom is the meanings and values that affect our choices.
Last edited by Eugene I on Thu Aug 26, 2021 9:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Toto, I have a feeling we're not in Kanzas anymore" Dorothy
User avatar
Soul_of_Shu
Posts: 2023
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2021 6:48 pm
Contact:

Re: Intuitive Idealism vs. Analytic Idealism (Part II): An alternative formulation of idealism

Post by Soul_of_Shu »

AshvinP wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 9:30 pm"But we shouldn't forget that it is up to us to undertake the work that will lead us to that Life." - Cleric
In this experience it still seems to be somehow Daemon driven, such that there comes a stage-specific point when one imperatively undertakes the challenge, because one can't not do so, as resistance is futile, and even unbearably uncomfortable.
Here out of instinct or grace we seek
soulmates in these galleries of hieroglyph and glass,
where mutual longings and sufferings of love
are laid bare in transfigured exhibition of our hearts,
we who crave deep secrets and mysteries,
as elusive as the avatars of our dreams.
User avatar
AshvinP
Posts: 5510
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:00 am
Location: USA

Re: Intuitive Idealism vs. Analytic Idealism (Part II): An alternative formulation of idealism

Post by AshvinP »

Soul_of_Shu wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 9:48 pm
AshvinP wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 9:30 pm"But we shouldn't forget that it is up to us to undertake the work that will lead us to that Life." - Cleric
In this experience it still seems to be somehow Daemon driven, such that there comes a stage-specific point when one imperatively undertakes the challenge, because one can't not do so, as resistance is futile, and even unbearably uncomfortable.

I have to come to think of all 'higher' beings involved in our current thought-activities as future versions of our-Selves, in a very literal sense. By prayer, and generally any devotional activities of the Spirit (including thoughtful contemplation), we manifest our own future thought-qualities in the present. It reminds me of some lines from the movie Inception:


ARTHUR: Okay, here's planting an idea: I say to you, "Don't think about elephants."
(Saito nods)
What are you thinking about?
SAITO: Elephants.
ARTHUR: Right. But it's not your idea because you know I gave it to you.
SAITO: You could plant it subconsciously-
ARTHUR: The subject's mind can always trace the genesis of the idea. True inspiration is impossible to fake.
COBB: No, it isn't.

... (new scene)

EAMES: Now, in the dream, I can impersonate Browning and suggest the concepts to Fischer's conscious mind...
EAMES: (draws a diagram) Then we take Fischer down another level and his own subconscious feeds it right back to him.
ARTHUR: (impressed) So he gives himself the idea.
EAMES: Precisely. That's the only way to make it stick. It has to seem self-generated.

... (new scene)

EAMES: Arthur? You're still working with that stick-in-the-mud?
COBB: He's a good point man.
EAMES: The best. But he has no imagination. If you're going to perform inception, you need imagination.
"A secret law contrives,
To give time symmetry:
There is, within our lives,
An exact mystery."
User avatar
Lou Gold
Posts: 2025
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2021 4:18 pm

Re: Intuitive Idealism vs. Analytic Idealism (Part II): An alternative formulation of idealism

Post by Lou Gold »

As an old and increasingly tired guy who once was quite attached to argumentation, I've arrived at the thought, "When feeling misunderstood the remedy often is to use fewer words." However, not being a philosopher, what do I know?
Be calm - Be clear - See the faults - See the suffering - Give your love
User avatar
Eugene I
Posts: 1484
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2021 9:49 pm

Re: Intuitive Idealism vs. Analytic Idealism (Part II): An alternative formulation of idealism

Post by Eugene I »

Lou Gold wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 10:26 pm However, not being a philosopher, what do I know?
However, being a philosopher, what do I know? :)
"Toto, I have a feeling we're not in Kanzas anymore" Dorothy
User avatar
Lou Gold
Posts: 2025
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2021 4:18 pm

Re: Intuitive Idealism vs. Analytic Idealism (Part II): An alternative formulation of idealism

Post by Lou Gold »

Eugene I wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 10:31 pm
Lou Gold wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 10:26 pm However, not being a philosopher, what do I know?
However, being a philosopher, what do I know? :)
SUPER !!!
Be calm - Be clear - See the faults - See the suffering - Give your love
Post Reply