No. Will and Wille are the same, the problem seems to be in what Schopenhauer meant, and they seem to not agree on it.
And most of us have not read Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung.
I think JW even said at some point that according to Schopenhauer "the will" is mindless, hope I am not misquoting him,
but that is another element that did not add up for me.
I think JW followed up somewhat sayin "Schopenhauer made it very clear"....so that I guess if read correctly in JWs view
there is no mind inside the will, so to speak, and now I guess JW can point us to those quotes etc and maybe we all
have to buy that sucker of a book
One thing is for sure in my mind: someone(s) has to prove that they really did their homework on Schopenhauer.
He was either an idealist or he wasnt, he can not have been both.
Dana, what about the convo-outline between JW and BK.
2 episodes, one about Schopp
enhauer and one about Rovellli etc?
I propose the Schoppenhauer-one comes first and the intro should
be about clarifying what "metaphysics" is, and then slowly but surely
delve into what made our friend Arturo tick. And then take it from there
or something.
hihihihi-#sneakyus!