Lorenzo, just as I said to Anthony, it would be the best if the root cause is addressed. In this particular case, the talks about how SS classifies, are only peripheral quarrels that only circumambulate around the center from which all resistance stems.
All this can be exemplified with a joke:
A rabbit comes into the bakery, and asks the baker "Do you have any carrot cake?". The baker is quite surprised, but has to respond "no". The rabbit leaves the store. The next day, the rabbit returns, and asks the baker "Do you sell carrot cake now?", but the baker again has to say "no". After the rabbit leaves the baker feels kind of guilty that he can't sell the rabbit a carrot cake. He looks up the recipe for carrot cake, buys the needed ingredients and bakes one.
The next day, the rabbit returns and again asks the baker for carrot cake. The baker answers "Yes, I do!" with glee, happy to finally help this customer out. To this the rabbit answers "Disgusting, isn't it?"
In other words, all those request about evidence for spiritual science are empty talks. Because even if you were provided with mathematical or whatever proof of SS, you would simply say "Disgusting, isn't it?"
Why is that? We need to approach the center to find out.
For decades of meditation it has been your ideal to let go of thoughts and anything that feels to be intentionally willed, and instead see it as an independent world picture that simply 'happens' while you observe from the standpoint of a pure spectator. The experience of will imbued with intention is considered a falsity in that view. We can't even begin approaching PoF, let alone SS, unless one tries to find within the picture of reality, the proper place of will imbued with intuitive intent. That such a will phenomenon exists is clear. Otherwise you wouldn't even be able to get out of bed in the morning (if you were to only detachedly spectate).
So in your view what gives the confidence that we can safely ignore the existence of will imbued with intuitive intents, and behave as if we're a peripheral spectator (even though we still need to use the illusion if our spectator's perspective is to survive few more days)? Can you conceive of
anything that may ever make you reconsider that? If your answer is "no" then it is all clear. Even if someone was to provide you with a proof sealed with red wax, you would just say "Disgusting, isn't it?"
I'm serious about this question. If you say that you are thoroughly convinced that will imbued with intuitive intent (best exemplified in thinking) is a pure illusion, and nothing will ever be able to even hint at you that there might be more to it, then there's no need whatsoever to discuss spiritual science. The latter is science of the
spirit, and spirit simply doesn't exist in a one-sided world where there's only the Cosmic soul with its images that come and go without conscious cause.